Zero Energy Buildings (ZEBs) have become a key focus in the quest for sustainable architecture and green building practices. These buildings are designed to minimise energy consumption and rely entirely on renewable energy sources to meet their energy needs. But what does this mean in practical terms, and how can it contribute to the global push towards sustainability?

Figure 1 – A Design Example of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) in a Tropical Climate – Featuring Multi-Solar Systems, Windcatchers, and a Greenhouse.

What Are Zero Energy Buildings (ZEBs)?

At the heart of green building design lies the goal of optimising resource use and reducing the environmental footprint of buildings. Zero Energy Buildings (ZEBs) take this objective to the next level by aiming to achieve near-zero net energy consumption throughout their operational lifespan. While ZEBs cannot yet be considered entirely ‘green’ in all aspects—such as in waste reduction, minimisation of by-products, or use of recyclable materials—they represent a significant leap forward in reducing reliance on fossil fuels. A ZEB generates as much energy as it consumes over the course of a year, making it a critical part of efforts to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In short, Zero Energy Buildings are those that balance their energy consumption with an equivalent amount of renewable energy produced on-site, resulting in minimal to zero energy demand from external sources.

Figure 2 – A Design Example of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) in a Tropical Climate – Greenhouse integration to moderate the inlet system’s fresh air

Global Progress Towards ZEBs: Europe and the USA

Although the concept of zero energy buildings is relatively recent, the focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from buildings has been ongoing for several decades. Different regions around the world have made significant strides towards achieving ZEBs, with varying degrees of success, and face unique challenges in terms of cost, technical capacity, and integration of renewable technologies. 1. Europe Europe has been at the forefront of pushing for ZEBs, with significant regulatory frameworks encouraging the transition to energy-efficient buildings. The European Union revised its Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) in 2010, aiming to make all new buildings nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) by 2020. This was followed by a 2018 update mandating that all new buildings must produce as much energy as they consume on-site by the end of 2020. Additionally, the European Green Deal, which targets climate neutrality by 2050, has strengthened efforts to promote ZEBs. Countries such as Germany, Sweden, and France have implemented ambitious building codes and financial incentives for energy-efficient construction. Retrofitting existing buildings to improve energy performance is also a significant part of the strategy, aiming for a sharp increase in renewable energy share in the building sector. 2. United States In the United States, ZEBs are seen as a critical part of the country’s strategy to achieve energy independence. The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 set ambitious goals for federal buildings, including a 30% reduction in energy use by 2015, and a target for all federal buildings to be net-zero by 2030. Numerous states and cities have introduced their own initiatives and incentives for Net Zero Energy Buildings. For example, California set a goal for all new residential buildings to be net-zero by 2020, with commercial buildings following by 2030. The federal government, alongside state-level programmes, provides incentives such as tax credits and grants to encourage the adoption of ZEBs. These legislative efforts, supported by standards set by the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), are pivotal in the United States’ efforts to reduce energy consumption and promote renewable energy in buildings.

Figure 3 – A Design Example of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) in a Tropical Climate – the design for optimum active & passive solar energy emerging

The Three Generations of Energy-Efficient Buildings

Buildings are classified based on their energy consumption, with ZEBs representing the most advanced level of energy efficiency. Here are the three stages of energy-efficient building design: 1. Low Energy Buildings (LEBs) – The First Step: Low Energy Buildings (LEBs) mark the starting point in the journey towards ZEBs. These buildings focus on reducing energy consumption but still rely on external energy sources. 2. Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) – The Intermediate Step: nZEBs generate at least 75% of their required energy on-site using renewable sources. While they may still rely on non-renewable energy for backup, they represent a significant step towards achieving full energy independence. 3. Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) – The Ultimate Goal: A Net Zero Energy Building generates as much renewable energy as it consumes over the course of a year. This energy balance is achieved through on-site renewable energy systems, such as solar panels, wind turbines, or geothermal heat pumps. For instance, a building may consume 2,000 kWh of electricity in the winter for heating, but produce a surplus of renewable energy during the summer, which is exported back to the grid, offsetting its energy consumption. To design a NZEB, two key analyses must be performed during the planning phase:

1. Reducing energy demand by employing passive design solutions and energy-efficient systems.
2. Generating sufficient renewable energy to meet the building’s energy requirements.

It is important to note that ZEBs are typically more suitable for residential or office settings. Buildings with fluctuating energy demands, such as hospitals or large commercial facilities, have yet to be successfully implemented as ZEBs due to their higher and more variable energy needs.

Figure 4 – A Design Example of a Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) in a Tropical Climate – Energy balance sheet to achieve annual zero absolute value

Conclusion

Zero Energy Buildings represent a crucial step towards a sustainable future. While challenges remain in terms of cost and technical implementation, the global push towards ZEBs is gaining momentum. With continued investment in renewable energy technologies and government incentives, ZEBs could become the standard for future building design. As the world works towards reducing its carbon footprint, Zero Energy Buildings will play a significant role in achieving sustainability goals, offering a model for energy-efficient and environmentally responsible construction.

References:

1. Garde, F., Lenoir, A., Scognamiglio, A., Aelenei, D., Waldren, D., Rostvik, H. N., Ayoub, J., Aelenei, L., Donn, M., Tardif, M., Cory, S. How to Design a Net Zero Energy Building? Solution Sets and Case Studies: Experience and Feedback of the IEA Task40/Annex52.
2. Berggren, B., Hall, M., Walla, M. LCE Analysis of Buildings – Taking the Step Towards Net Zero Energy Buildings, Sweden.
3. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
4. Butera, F. M. Advances in Building Energy Research, “Zero-Energy Buildings: The Challenges”, Politecnico di Milano, BEST, Via Bonardi 9, Milan, 2013, Italy.
5. IEA SHC Task 40/ECB Annex 52. Towards Net Zero Energy Solar Buildings (NZEBs).
6. Lenoir, A., Wurtz, E., Garde, F. Zero Energy Buildings in France: Overview and Feedback.
7. Marszala, A. J. et al. North European Understanding of Zero Energy/Emission Buildings.
8. Thalfeldt, M., Pikasa, E., Kurnitskia, J., Vollb, H. Facade Design Principles for Nearly Zero Energy Buildings in a Cold Climate, Estonia.
9. International Energy Agency (IEA). Technology Roadmap, Energy Efficient Building Envelopes.
10. Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE). Principles for Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings, 2011.